NuclePhaser: a YOLO-based framework for cell nuclei detection and counting in phase contrast images of arbitrary size with support of fast calibration and testing on specific use cases
Voloshin, N.; Putlyaev, E.; Chechekhina, E.; Usachev, V.; Karagyaur, M.; Bozov, K.; Grigorieva, O.; Tyurin-Kuzmin, P.; Kulebyakin, K.
Show abstract
Microscopy is an essential method in modern biology, and brightfield microscopy methods (phase contrast, differential interference contrast, etc.) are being widely used and actively developed since they dont require sample fixation and staining. But they produce low contrast images, where cells have similar intensity to the background. In this work we developed and tested a set of deep learning object detection YOLO models that detect cell nuclei in phase contrast images, which allows cell count and tracking without staining. We created a large dataset consisting of more than 100,000 640x640 pixels images with more than 3 million nuclei of 4 different cell cultures (CHO, HEK293, iPSCs, and MSCs). Using images from various microscopes and cameras, as well as full-scale augmentations, we developed a set of highly generalized models that can detect nuclei in images across different cell types and imaging conditions, including different microscopes and contrast methods. Combined with sliced inference methods, these algorithms can be applied to images of any size, allowing studies of large quantities of cells. Moreover, we developed a training-free calibration and testing algorithm based on confidence threshold optimization. It allows for fine-tuning of models for specific cell types and/or imaging options and evaluating the accuracy of the calibrated model. This provides a highly controllable and reliable method for studying cell proliferation rate, single cell tracking and other scenarios. Additionally, we developed a NuclePhaser plugin for Napari (https://github.com/nikvo1/napari-nuclephaser), which allows users to calibrate, test and apply our models in code-free manner. Given that the YOLO models are fast and can run at sufficient speeds even on CPUs, this makes our work highly accessible to a wide range of researchers.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digitally Predicting Protein Localization and Manipulating Protein Activity in Fluorescence Images Using Four-dimensional Reslicing GAN 95%
- Joint Registration of Multiple Point Clouds for Fast Particle Fusion in Localization Microscopy 94%
- EM-stellar: benchmarking deep learning for electron microscopy image segmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeLTA: Automated cell segmentation, tracking, and lineage reconstruction using deep learning 96%
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data 95%
- DeepMIB: User-friendly and open-source software for training of deep learning network for biological image segmentation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- microbeSEG: A deep learning software tool with OMERO data management for efficient and accurate cell segmentation 96%
- SAMCell: Generalized Label-Free Biological Cell Segmentation with Segment Anything 96%
- Caveolae and scaffold detection from single molecule localization microscopy data using deep learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.