Back

Visual Field Inhomogeneities Shape Visual Working Memory

Papiernik-Kłodzinska, J.; Del Pin, S. H.; Wierzchon, M.; Carrasco, M.; Rutiku, R.

2025-05-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.13.653695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whether early visual cortex (V1) is essential for visual working memory (vWM) performance remains a topic of scientific debate. The current study aimed to expand previous research findings by examining whether idiosyncratic structural properties of V1, particularly visual field inhomogeneities such as visual field and polar angle asymmetries, are reflected in interindividual differences in vWM performance. A total of 292 participants underwent an MRI scan using a multiparametric mapping sequence, generating four quantitative microstructural maps per participant: magnetization transfer (MT), proton density (PD), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2*). In a separate session, the participants completed a vWM task designed to probe visual field inhomogeneities. Behavioral results are consistent with previously reported asymmetries in vWM, particularly the inverted polarity of the vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA). Quantitative MRI analysis revealed associations between VMA and multiple qMRI parameters in V1, indicating that individual differences in V1 architecture contribute to variability in vWM performance. Additionally, cortical thickness measures revealed a link between V3 and left-right asymmetry, suggesting that structural variability beyond V1 also shapes vWM performance. These findings are consistent with the sensory recruitment hypothesis and suggest that structural characteristics of early visual areas influence vWM performance.

Published in Cerebral Cortex (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.