Back

Lightning-caused disturbance frequency and severity varies with topography in an Afromontane forest

Gora, E.; Ngute, A. S. K.; Batumike, R.; Cuni-Sanchez, A.; Imani, G.; Kaplin, B.; Bantlin, D.; Bitariho, R.; Zoletto, B.; Petridis, N.; Sheil, D.; Sullivan, M. J. P.

2025-05-16 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.13.653675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lightning is an important agent of tropical tree mortality, but we know little about lightning-caused disturbances beyond one lowland tropical forest in Panama. Here we quantified variation in the frequency and severity of visually-detectable lightning-caused disturbances across topography in the montane forests of Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda. This was the first systematic assessment of lightning-caused disturbance in Africa and a preliminary test of the hypothesis that forest tolerance to lightning is higher where lightning disturbances are more common. Lightning-caused disturbances were observed six-times more frequently on ridges than in valleys, but lightning-caused disturbances in valleys tended to cause more tree-level damage than those on ridges. Overall, lightning disturbances tended to kill a lower proportion of trees in this Afromontane forest than in previously documented lightning disturbances in tropical America. We also observed less tree-level damage to Syzygium spp.(Myrtaceae) compared to the community-wide average, providing support for taxonomic differences in lightning tolerance. Our results indicate that lightning disturbance severity differs within and among sites, mediated in part by differences in lightning tolerance among tree species, and provide some support for the hypothesis that disturbance severity declines with disturbance frequency.

Published in Journal of Ecology (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.