Layer-specific spatiotemporal dynamics of feedforward and feedback in human visual object perception
Carricarte, T.; Xie, S.; Singer, J.; Trampel, R.; Huber, L.; Weiskopf, N.; Cichy, R. M.
Show abstract
Visual object perception is mediated by information flow between regions of the ventral visual stream along feedforward and feedback anatomical connections. However, feedforward and feedback signals during naturalistic vision are rapid and overlapping, complicating their identification and precise functional specification. Here we recorded human layer-specific fMRI responses to naturalistic object images in early visual cortex (EVC) and lateral occipital complex (LOC) to isolate feedforward and feedback information signals spatially by their cortical layer specific termination pattern. We combined these layer-specific fMRI responses with electroencephalography (EEG) responses for the same images to segregate feedforward and feedback signals in both time and space. Feedforward signals emerge early in the middle layers of EVC and LOC, followed by feedback signals in the superficial layer of both regions, and the deep layer of EVC. Comparing the identified dynamics in LOC to a visual deep neural network (DNN), revealed that early feedforward signals in LOC encode medium complexity features, whereas later feedback signals increase the representational format to high complexity features. Together this specifies the spatiotemporal dynamics and functional role of feedforward and feedback information flow mediating visual object perception.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in prefrontal cortex during working memory 95%
- A whole-brain monosynaptic input connectome to neuron classes in mouse visual cortex 95%
- Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.