Socioeconomic Position and Falls Among Middle- and Older-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review with a Life Course Approach
Smit, F.; Franco, M. R.; Sherrington, C.; Cullati, S.; Blyth, F. M.; van Zwieten, A.; Khalatbari-Soltani, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundFalls among middle- and older-aged adults are a significant public health concern. However, a holistic understanding of how different indicators of socioeconomic position (SEP) are associated with falls is lacking, particularly for SEP across the life course. MethodsWe systematically searched for observational studies analysing the association between at least one indicator of SEP and one fall outcome. Due to heterogeneity between included studies, results were narratively synthesised. ResultsAfter de-duplication, 5,880 search results were screened and 125 studies were included. Only 14 included studies explicitly aimed to study the relationship between SEP and falls, which generally found that higher SEP was associated with lower risks/rates of falls. An additional nine studies also had relevant adjusted models that also largely showed a protective relationship. However, adjusted results were mixed and often lacked statistical significance. The remaining 102 studies only contained unadjusted results of interest, with 50%-100% of results for each SEP indicator showing that low SEP groups experience disproportionately high risks/rates of fall outcomes compared to high SEP groups. Notably, only four studies measured any SEP indicators from a stage of the life course prior to the study period. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that falls disproportionately impact low SEP groups and that knowledge gaps exist regarding the relationship between different SEP indicators and falls, particularly for SEP exposures across the life course. Future research on this topic should utilise causal diagrams for appropriate model building and include a wide range of SEP indicators across the life course.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study 96%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Community Support for Injured Patients: A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 94%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Return to Work with Long COVID: A Rapid Review of Support and Challenges 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 91%
- Changes in health behaviors, mental and physical health among older adults under severe lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 91%
- Prevalence and Nature of Sexual Violence in Older Adults in Europe: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Evidence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 94%
- Effects of supervised high-intensity hardstyle kettlebell training on grip strength and health-related physical fitness in insufficiently active older adults: The BELL pragmatic controlled trial 94%
- “If somebody had told me I’d feel like I do now, I wouldn’t have believed them…” Older adults’ experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle-Aged and Older Canadian Women and Men: An Analysis of the CLSA 93%
- Cumulative Social Disadvantage and Health-Related Quality of Life: National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017 91%
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.