Back

Efficient Cas9 nuclease-based editing in skeletal muscle via lipid nanoparticle delivery

Iyer, S.; Daman, K.; Sun, Y.; Tutto, A.; Holbrook, S.; Joynt, A.; Yan, J.; Ambegaokar, P.; Guo, D.; Liu, P.; Stauffer, J.; Lee, S.; Gallagher, T.; Cox, G. A.; Keeler, A. M.; Siegwart, D. J.; Emerson, C. P.; Wolfe, S. A.

2025-05-12 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.12.653518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene editing holds great promise for muscular dystrophy treatment, but the rapid evaluation of different editing modalities in skeletal muscle in vivo remains challenging due to lack of simple, effective delivery tools. Here we demonstrate that selective organ targeting (SORT) lipid nanoparticles (LNP) encapsulating optimized Cas9 cargo can facilitate efficient, local delivery to skeletal muscles achieving editing rates [≥]35% and restore protein expression for a proof-of-concept muscular dystrophy target. Interestingly, efficient editing in skeletal muscle was observed despite a strong adaptive immune response to repeat dosing of the Cas9 LNPs. High efficiency editing mediated by LNP-based delivery of Cas9 to skeletal muscle permitted detailed analysis of insertion and deletion (InDel) outcomes in vivo for a set of potential therapeutic target sites, which differed substantially from InDel outcomes observed in proliferating cells in one specific instance. Overall, our findings on enhanced LNP delivery of Cas9, platform-specific immune responses, and differential editing patterns observed between in vitro and in vivo models provide valuable insights that should inform the development of gene editing therapeutics for neuromuscular diseases. One Sentence SummarySORT LNPs permitted efficient Cas9-mediated repair of a pathogenic allele in skeletal muscle in a mouse model of LGMDR7.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.