Hypothesis test of arbitrary parametric structure in a generalized additive model
Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.
Show abstract
Before applying flexible nonparametric models such as a generalized additive model (GAM), it is natural to ask whether a simpler parametric form suffices. To address this question, we develop TAPS (Test for Arbitrary Parametric Structure), a framework that integrates estimation and hypothesis testing to evaluate whether a prespecified parametric form adequately captures a covariate effect in a GAM. TAPS accommodates diverse structures, including linearity, piecewise linearity with changepoints, discontinuities with jumps, among many others. It is implemented in the R package mgcv.taps built directly on mgcv, enabling seamless adoption, broad outcome support, and scalability to biobank-scale data. Using UK Biobank data, we analyze 38 continuous and 8 binary traits to investigate two scientific questions: does the effect of a polygenic risk score (PRS) vary with age beyond a linear interaction, and does retirement at age 65 modify this age-varying effect? We find that age-varying PRS effects are common and often strongly non-linear, and that retirement at 65 significantly modifies these effects for five traits after multiple-testing correction.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Stability-Enhanced Lasso Approach for Covariate Selection in Non-Linear Mixed Effect Model 96%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 96%
- Penalized reduced rank regression for multi-outcome survival data supports a common metabolic risk score for age-related diseases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the overall fraction of phenotypic variance attributed to high-dimensional predictors measured with error 95%
- Fast Lasso method for Large-scale and Ultrahigh-dimensional Cox Model with applications to UK Biobank 95%
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Multiple Biomarkers of an Underlying Common Exposure 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Causally Ordered and Non-ordered Mediators based on Summarized Genetic Data 95%
- Two-Stage Multivariate Mendelian Randomization on Multiple Outcomes with Mixed Distributions 93%
- Estimating the Effects of Treatment Regimes over the Course of Chronic Disease: A Multi-state Causal Framework with Baseline Confounding 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.