The Predictive and Prognostic Value of T- and B-cell Transcriptomic Signatures for Clinical Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Pleural Mesothelioma
van Genugten, J.; Faulkner, D.; Hahne, J. C.; Disselhorst, M.; Wessels, L.; Fennell, D.; Baas, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab improves overall survival and has become standard-of-care, responses are variable and there are no predictive biomarkers for treatment outcome among PM patients with epithelioid histology. MethodsWe developed an eight-gene T-cell and six-gene B-cell transcriptomic signature. To quantify T- and B-cell infiltration, a geometric-mean T- and B-cell expression score was calculated for each patient. Immune profiles were generated in three ICB-naive PM cohorts (n = 448), and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate prognostic value of the signatures. Predictive value was tested in five independent ICB-treated cohorts (n = 104). ResultsIn ICB-naive patients, high B-cell infiltration was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.82), whereas T-cell infiltration had no prognostic value. Among patients treated with 2nd line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, high T-cell infiltration predicted better objective response and improved overall survival (HR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.36). This effect was absent in patients treated with 2nd line nivolumab alone or any other anti-PD1/PDL1 drug combined with non-immunotherapeutics. B-cell infiltration showed no predictive value in any ICB-treated group. ConclusionsThe eight-gene T-cell signature is a specific predictor of outcome after 2nd line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, while B-cell infiltration is prognostic in ICB-naive disease.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bexmarilimab-induced macrophage activation leads to treatment benefit in solid tumors: the phase I/II first-in-human MATINS trial 95%
- Determination of permissive and restraining cancer-associated fibroblast (DeCAF) subtypes 95%
- Conserved angio-immune subtypes of the cancer microenvironment predict response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting immunotherapy response in advanced bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of six independent cohorts 95%
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 94%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elucidating the heterogeneity of immunotherapy response and immune-related toxicities by longitudinal ctDNA and immune cell compartment tracking in lung cancer 94%
- Myeloid cell-associated resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer revealed through bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing 94%
- Circulating tumor DNA analysis in advanced urothelial carcinoma: insights from biological analysis and extended clinical follow-up 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Th17.1 cell driven sarcoidosis-like inflammation after anti-BCMA CAR T cells in multiple myeloma 94%
- HDAC1 acts as tumor suppressor in ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: Implications for HDAC inhibitor therapy 91%
- Multiple Myeloma DREAM Challenge Reveals Epigenetic Regulator PHF19 As Marker of Aggressive Disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 95%
- Identification of tumor-intrinsic drivers of immune exclusion in acral melanoma 95%
- Germline prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation for immune-related adverse events 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.