Decoding hypnotic consciousness: neural and experiential insights into induced and ideomotor suggestions
Gelebart, J.; Foure, A.; Quentin, R.; Debarnot, U.
Show abstract
Hypnotic induction and ideomotor suggestions provide a powerful framework for investigating the remarkable capacity of verbal influence to reshape conscious experience, cognition, and motor control. We employed a multimodal approach combining high-density EEG, respiratory and behavioral monitoring, and first-person reports across three conditions: baseline resting state, progressive hypnotic induction (Light and Deep states), and an ideomotor task comparing a hypnotically suggested arm catalepsy to a voluntary simulation. EEG results revealed that light hypnosis was associated with early parieto-occipital alpha suppression and increased theta-band activity. As hypnosis deepened, frontoparietal connectivity increased in the theta while parasympathetic activation declined, challenging the view of hypnosis as a passive, low-arousal state and instead pointing to active top-down reorganization of large-scale brain networks. During the ideomotor state, participants exhibited distinct patterns of behavioral responsiveness, classified as tremblers and non-tremblers, despite reporting comparable disruptions in the sense of agency. Phenomenological analyses corroborated these distinctions, revealing that Tremblers attempted to move despite experiencing the action as involuntary or constrained, whereas Non-Tremblers refrained from acting due to a perceived impossibility or an inability to initiate the motor command. EEG connectivity analysis in Tremblers showed an increased frontoparietal gamma activity and reduced delta connectivity, suggesting heightened sensorimotor integration and greater executive monitoring under motor conflict. Together, these findings demonstrate that hypnosis engages dynamic top-down processes that reconfigure both neural connectivity and subjective experience depending on suggestion-types. They support predictive coding accounts of agency disruption and underscore the value of neurophenomenological methods for advancing consciousness science and informing clinical applications.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical and autonomic responses during staged Taoist meditation: two distinct meditation strategies. 95%
- Increased signal diversity/complexity of spontaneous EEG in humans given sub-anaesthetic doses of ketamine 95%
- Hyper-connectivity between the left motor cortex and prefrontal cortex is associated with the severity of dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory system in fibromyalgia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aperiodic brain activity and response to anesthesia vary in disorders of consciousness 95%
- EEG microstate dynamics indicate a U-shaped path to propofol-induced loss of consciousness 94%
- A comparison of GABA-ergic (propofol) and non-GABA-ergic (dexmedetomidine) sedation on visual and motor cortical oscillations, using magnetoencephalography. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG alpha-theta dynamics during mind wandering in the context of breath focus meditation: an experience sampling approach with novice meditation practitioners 94%
- Respiratory coupling between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of rats anesthetized with urethane in theta and non-theta states 93%
- Urethane Anesthesia Exhibits Neurophysiological Correlates of Unconsciousness and is Distinct from Sleep 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation 95%
- Expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception 93%
- No support for the effect of tDCS on frontal alpha asymmetry and behavioral and brain activity indices of inhibitory control 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.