Predicting Neural Activity from Connectome Embedding Spaces
Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Mihalas, S.
Show abstract
Understanding how structured patterns of neural activity emerge from the underlying connectivity is fundamental to elucidating brain function. While cortical connectomes are intrinsically high-dimensional, population activity typically resides in a much lower-dimensional subspace. Consequently, only a small fraction of the information encoded in the connectome appears relevant for shaping activity. Can we identify low-dimensional features of the connectome features be that reliably predict neural activity? Leveraging the MICrONS dataset, which combines millimeter-scale, nanometer-resolution connectivity with simultaneously recorded in-vivo activity, we demonstrate a statistically significant alignment between morphological and functional similarity, quantified by subspace angles and centered kernel alignment. Topological analyses further reveal that the representation spaces of both the connectome and neural activity share a low-dimensional hyperbolic geometry with exponential scaling. These parallels motivated the hypothesis that embedding anatomical affinities into an appropriate geometric space can isolate the functionally relevant features of the connectome. We therefore applied multidimensional scaling to generate such embeddings and trained a simple linear model to reconstruct neuronal activity. Remarkably, the embedded connectome explained 68% in activity similarity, surpassing models that had direct access to activity similarity itself and outperforming similarly simple models that used the full high-dimensional connectome (56%). Our findings uncover a robust structure-function coupling: geometry-aware dimensionality reduction discards much of the connectomes microscopic detail yet yields superior predictions of neural activity. This suggests that synaptic wiring implicitly encodes an abstract, low-dimensional organization that underlies the observed low-dimensional cortical activity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.