Expectation modulates the hedonic experiences of and midbrain responses to sweet flavour
Mainetto, E.; Westwater, M. L.; Ziauddeen, H.; Diederen, K. M.; Fletcher, P. C.
Show abstract
Non-nutritive sweeteners are sugar substitutes that may promote weight management by reducing an individuals calorie intake. It is, however, unclear whether (i) sugar and non-nutritive sweetener elicit distinct orosensory responses in the human brain, and (ii) whether the neural responses to these flavours are modulated by expectancy. Addressing these questions has direct relevance to our understanding of food choice behaviour and how it may be modified in dietary interventions. We screened N=99 healthy adults to select a sample (N=27, M[SD]age = 24.25[2.94] years) who reported similar perceptual experiences of sugar and sweetener, thus removing a potential confound of sensory differences, for fMRI scanning. While scanning, they received sugar- and artificially-sweetened beverages in two conditioning paradigms, which both manipulated participants expectation of flavour delivery: first in a probabilistic and second in a deterministic way. Participants ability to accurately distinguish sugar from non-nutritive sweetener depended largely on their expectations, which also significantly affected the perceived pleasantness of each flavour. Expectation altered brain responses to flavour delivery during the deterministic task only, where the (mistaken) expectation of sugar significantly increased midbrain responses to sweetener compared to when sweetener was expected. Trial-wise confidence and pleasantness ratings differentially augmented brain responses to sugar and sweetener delivery. These results highlight the importance of expectancy in both the behavioural and neural encoding of sweet flavour, particularly in the context of unreliable sensory information. The expectation of sugar appears to increase the subjective value of noncaloric sweetener, which may result from flavour-nutrient conditioning that preferentially reinforcers sugar.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Representations of Food-Related Attributes in the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex During Choice Deliberation in Anorexia Nervosa 96%
- Domain-general neural effects of associative learning and expectations on pain and hedonic taste perception 96%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dopamine neuron ensembles signal the content of sensory prediction errors 94%
- L-DOPA modulates activity in the vmPFC, Nucleus Accumbens and VTA during threat extinction learning in humans 93%
- Evidence accumulation, not "self-control," explains dorsolateral prefrontal activationduring normative choice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthier decisions in the cued-attribute food choice paradigm have high test-retest reliability across five task repetitions over 14 days 93%
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 92%
- Noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates rationality of human decision-making 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.