Back

Likelihood of blood culture positivity using SeptiCyte RAPID

Navalkar, K.; Wheelock, A.; Gregory, M.; Clark, D. V.; Kibuuka, H.; Okello, S.; Atukunda, S.; Wailagala, A.; Waitt, P.; Kakooza, F.; Oduro, G.; Adams, N.; Dietrich, M.; von der Forst, M.; Schultz, M. J.; Greenberg, J. A.; Aggarwal, N. R.; Yager, T. D.; Brandon, R. B.

2025-05-11 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.05.09.25327025 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early diagnosis and identification of causative pathogens using blood culture in patients suspected of Blood Stream Infection (BSI) and sepsis are critical for improving patient outcomes through early and more targeted treatment. There is a need for tools that can guide the use of microbiologic diagnostics, especially where resources are limited, such as in lower and middle income countries (LMICs), pandemic and mass-casualty scenarios, and prolonged field care settings during military operations. MethodsPost-hoc retrospective analysis of individual patient data from three prospective clinical studies, conducted in North America, Europe and Africa, to investigate the association between SeptiCyte RAPID test results (SeptiScores) and blood culture (BC) results. Hypothesisthat a significant correlation exists between elevated SeptiScores and positive blood culture results, and between low SeptiScores and negative blood culture results. ResultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.91 for 85 BC(+) versus 257 SIRS, and was 0.80 for 164 BC(-) versus 257 SIRS. As the SeptiScore increases, the relative probability of a septic patient being BC(+) as opposed to BC(-) also increases. A non-linear positive correlation is observed. Below a crossover point at SeptiScore 10, the ratio of probabilities of BC(+) sepsis / BC(-) sepsis is <1 while above the crossover point this ratio is >1. Thus, septic patients with SeptiScores >10 have a higher probability of being BC(+) compared to BC(-). ConclusionsElevated SeptiScores, obtained before blood culture results, are indicative of increased blood culture positivity. This may have clinical utility, particularly in resource limited settings, as an aid for improving the efficiency of blood culture practice, for instance by informing patient selection and interpretation of blood culture results.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.5%
2
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
8
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
12
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%