Unbiased genetics identifies a glutamatergic signaling network as a mediator of daily sleep patterns.
Grizzard, S.; Lord, J. S.; Ravens, A. L.; Hao, Y.; Tang, W.; Lee, S. H.; Sleiman, S. J.; Joyce, K. K.; Donohue, K. D.; O'Hara, B. F.; Zou, F.; Kafri, T.; Diering, G. H.
Show abstract
Sleep is a fundamental, conserved behavior important for survival. In many species, sleep behavior is controlled by poorly understood interactions between a system of circadian rhythms (CR), which promote sleep at ecologically appropriate times, and a homeostatic sleep drive that accumulates with time awake. The CR is a cellular phenomenon, driven by molecular oscillations of "clock genes" in nearly all cells. Emerging evidence indicates neuronal synapses are a key locus for the accumulation and resolution of sleep need, supporting a cellular basis of sleep need. Indeed, efforts to understand the genetic basis of sleep need identified Homer1a, a regulator of synapse homeostasis. To develop further insight into the genetic basis of sleep regulation, we measured daily sleep patterns in genetically diverse strains of mice from the Collaborative Cross. Strains with 1) highly consolidated light-phase sleep, or 2) fragmented, arrhythmic sleep, were identified for genetic analysis using quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Excitingly, in F2 hybrids, 19 of 32 metrics of sleep and circadian behavior mapped to a narrow QTL containing GRM5, a postsynaptic glutamate receptor and binding partner of Homer1a, and GCPII, an astrocytic enzyme that regulates NAAG, a peptide agonist for the presynaptic/astrocytic glutamate receptor GRM3. Collectively, these genes form a coordinated glutamatergic signaling network across the tri-partite synapse. Pharmacology targeting GRM5, GCPII, and GRM3 strongly modulated sleep, functionally validating them as sleep-regulating genes. Our findings support a model in which synapses act as a cellular site for integration of circadian and sleep-need signals to regulate daily sleep patterns. Significance StatementSleep is a fundamental pillar of human health. Restorative sleep is supported by circadian rhythms (CR). Sleep and CR disruptions are prevalent in neuropsychiatric conditions and are increasingly understood as causal drivers of altered brain function and behavior. Therefore, sleep and CR are attractive therapeutic targets to improve health. However, the basic biological mechanisms that couple our need to sleep with the CR are not understood. Genetic discovery using diverse strains of mice identifies a glutamatergic signaling network coordinated across the synapse as an underlying genetic basis for daily sleep patterns. This work builds upon a growing body showing that excitatory synapses are a cellular site for the resolution of sleep need and interaction with the CR.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep deprivation following hippocampus-dependent learning downscales synaptic inputs to lateral and medial entorhinal cortex interneurons 96%
- Immunization with Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659 prevents the development of PTSD- like sleep and behavioral phenotypes after sleep disruption and acute stress in mice 96%
- A conserved role for sleep in supporting spatial learning in Drosophila 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A REM-active basal ganglia circuit that regulates anxiety 97%
- Recognition of distinct sleep states in Drosophila uncovers previously obscured homeostatic and circadian control of sleep. 96%
- Polyamine elevation and nitrogen stress are toxic hallmarks of chronic sleep loss in Drosophila melanogaster 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Astrocytic metabolic control of orexinergic activity in the lateral hypothalamus regulates sleep and wake architecture 96%
- Causal role for sleep-dependent reactivation of learning-activated sensory ensembles for fear memory consolidation 95%
- Reassessing the validity of slow-wave dynamics as a proxy for NREM sleep homeostasis 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.