Back

Hierarchical Heterogeneities in Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Cytoplasm

Moeckel, C.; Biswas, A.; Reber, S.; Chechkin, A.; Zaburdaev, V.; Guck, J.

2025-05-09 biophysics
10.1101/2025.05.08.652886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding of the dynamics inherent to biological matter is crucial for illuminating the physical mechanisms underlying cellular processes. In this study, we employ bright-field differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) to investigate density fluctuations inherent in a cell-free model of eukaryotic cytoplasm. Our measurements reveal subdiffusive fractional Brownian motion and non-Gaussian displacement distributions, highlighting cytoplasmic heterogeneity. We introduce an empirical model that combines fractional Brownian motion with an inverse Gaussian distribution of diffusivities to describe the observed non-Gaussianity. Validated through Monte Carlo simulations, this model allows us to estimate the fractional diffusivity and exponent effectively. By altering macromolecular composition, the addition of energy, and assembly of a cytoskeleton, we identify three independent mechanisms that result in similar fractional exponents yet distinct diffusivities. We find that energy addition leads to non-stationary dynamics, in contrast to the stationary behavior observed under passive conditions. Presence of microtubules introduces a secondary dynamical timescale, which we describe using a two-state fractional Brownian motion model to differentiate between cytosolic and microtubule network associated contributions. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of DDM as a label-free tool for quantifying viscoelastic and heterogeneous properties of the cytoplasm and provide insights into how physical and biochemical factors, including cytoskeletal organization, govern subcellular dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.