Back

APOE genotype confers context dependent neurovascular vulnerability in immune-vascularized human forebrain organoids

Fang, H.; Liao, X.; Bullen, C. K.; Pu, R.; Wang, H.; Condoleo, J.; Cheat, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huo, D.; Lissit, K.; Yang, A.; Jarvis, K.; Neifert, S.; Huang, Y.; Bishai, W.; Jain, S. K.; Dawson, T.; Dawson, V. L.; Xu, J.

2025-05-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.08.652864 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The APOE gene is a major genetic determinant of neurovascular and immune function, yet the mechanisms by which its isoforms modulate brain vulnerability to pathogenic stress remain incompletely understood. Here, we employ isogenic human iPSC-derived immune-vascularized--Forebrain Organoid-based Multicellular Assembled Cerebral Organoids (FORMA-COs)--to dissect isoform-specific responses to a clinically relevant viral challenge. We find that APOE2/2 and APOE4/4 FORMA-COs exhibit heightened viral RNA burden and distinct neuroinflammatory profiles compared to APOE3/3. Specifically, APOE4/4 promotes IL-1 and VEGFA induction, whereas APOE2/2 leads to elevated TNF-{beta} and VEGFA protein accumulation, indicating divergent pathways of injury. Integrated transcriptomic analyses, combined with known and predicted APOE protein-protein interaction networks, reveal genotype-dependent enrichment of cytokine signaling, angiogenic remodeling, and immune dysregulation. In vivo validation using humanized mouse models corroborates APOE genotype- specific vascular remodeling, microglial activation, and oligodendrocyte perturbation. These findings demonstrate that APOE genotype confers context-specific susceptibility to neuroimmune and vascular injury, providing insight into genetic risk mechanisms underlying infection-related and neurodegenerative brain disorders.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.