Back

Using Constraint-Based Metabolic Modeling to Elucidate Drug-Induced Metabolic Changes in a Cancer Cell Line

Benedicto, X.; Flobak, A.; Ponce de Leon, M.; Valencia, A.

2025-05-13 systems biology
10.1101/2025.05.08.652850 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cells frequently reprogram their metabolism to support growth and survival, making metabolic pathways attractive targets for therapy. In this study, we investigated the metabolic effects of three kinase inhibitors and their synergistic combinations in the gastric cancer cell line AGS using genome-scale metabolic models and transcriptomic profiling. We applied the TIDE (Tasks Inferred from Differential Expression) algorithm to infer pathway activity changes and introduced TIDE-essential, a new variant that focuses on task-essential genes, enhancing results robustness. Our results revealed widespread down-regulation of biosynthetic pathways, particularly in amino acid and nucleotide metabolism. Combinatorial treatments induced condition-specific metabolic alterations, including strong synergistic effects in the PI3Ki-MEKi condition affecting ornithine and polyamine biosynthesis. These metabolic shifts provide insight into drug synergy mechanisms and highlight potential therapeutic vulnerabilities. To support reproducibility, we developed an open-source Python package, MTEApy, implementing both TIDE frameworks.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.2%
8
Metabolic Engineering
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.1%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
18
Metabolites
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Oncology
○ 103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
26
Cell Communication and Signaling
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.