Customized and rapid observational delimiting surveys for plant pests based on transect data and scouting
Caton, B.; Pallipparambil, G.; Fang, H.
Show abstract
We have created a complete, standard methodology for designing customized observation-based delimiting surveys for localized incursions of non-endemic plant pests. We propose using transects customized for the species and situation to do the following: O_LICollect data for [~]120 detections C_LIO_LIFit an exponential function to the histogram using an extreme values analysis peaks-over-threshold (EVA POT) technique C_LIO_LICalculate a percentile-based boundary distance that accounts for two-dimensional (radial) spread C_LIO_LIUse field scouting for verification C_LI We call the approach "Delimitation via Transect Data and Scouting," or DTDS. In simulations we compared DTDS plans to published survey plans for the Asian longhorned beetle (ALB; Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky)), the fungus Phyllosticta citricarpa (Guigci), and the tomato brown rugose fruit virus (TBRFV; Tobamovirus). The EVA POT method avoided problems with highly skewed data, and ninety-ninth percentile boundary estimates from it that accounted for radial dispersal always contained the adventive populations. Based on sample sizes, time required, and success (containment) rates the DTDS surveys were efficient and effective. For ALB and TBRFV, DTDS surveys reduced sample sizes and durations by 77 percent or more. For P. citricarpa, the DTDS design greatly increased the sample area, but eliminated 6% (scenario 1) and 68% (scenario 2) failure rates in the original plan. The DTDS methodology synthesizes established techniques in a novel way, providing a standardized, clear, and often rapid process for designing customized, transect-based observation-based delimitation surveys that are both efficient and effective. The approach has clear management and financial benefits, and should facilitate quicker, improved decision making. Key messagesO_LIDTDS is a customizable delimitation survey design method based on transect sampling and scouting C_LIO_LITransects designed to produce [~]120 positives facilitate efficient sampling of incursion areas C_LIO_LIBoundaries can be accurately determined with uncertainty using extreme values analysis of the distance data C_LIO_LICase studies demonstrated that using DTDS always contained incursions and often greatly reduced survey effort C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations 94%
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 92%
- Accounting for animal movement improves vaccination strategies against wildlife disease in heterogeneous landscapes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stochastic population models to identify optimal and cost-effective harvest strategies for feral pig eradication 92%
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 90%
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Agricultural margins could enhance landscape connectivity for pollinating insects across the Central Valley of California, U.S.A. 94%
- Optimal inventorying and monitoring of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity 92%
- Insect-habitat-plant interaction networks provide guidelines to mitigate the risk of transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to grapevine in Southern France 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- One size does not fit all: a novel approach for determining the Realised Viewshed Size for remote camera traps 94%
- Impact network analysis and the INA R package: Decision support for regional management interventions 92%
- PointedSDMs -- an R package to help facilitate the construction of integrated species distribution models 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.