Spatial Richness of Neural Magnetic Fields
Ali, Z.; Poon, A. S. Y.
Show abstract
Brain implants that measure neural magnetic fields, rather than electrical potentials, are expected to confer significant clinical advantages related to implant longevity and signal fidelity due to the elimination of the electrode-tissue interface. However, the informational differences between neural electrical potentials and magnetic fields remain poorly understood. Using a mathematical formalism based on neuronal current sources, we directly establish the complementary informational content of extracellular magnetic fields and electrical potentials. We then use computational modeling to illustrate how dense networks of neurons are easier to distinguish and spike sort on the basis of their magnetic, rather than electrical, spike templates. Lastly, we show how the solenoidal nature of neural magnetic fields facilitates approximate morphological reconstruction, even with sparse sensor arrays. Our findings highlight the unique experimental advantages of neural magnetic field sensing, motivating the development of compact, low-noise devices capable of meeting the stringent sensitivity requirements for single-shot cortical recordings.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-Scale Analysis of Frequency-Dependent Calcium Dynamics in Retinal Ganglion Cells Under Electric Field Stimulation 95%
- Photons guided by axons may enable backpropagation-based learning in the brain 94%
- Probing and predicting ganglion cell responses to smooth electrical stimulation in healthy and blind mouse retina 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.