How do families cope with major societal stressors: a qualitative study of family coping during the pandemic?
Bali, E.; Petr-Romao, P.; Dyas, R.; English, O.; MacLean, J.; O'Neil, I.; Minnis, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundMajor societal stressors such as wars, natural disasters and pandemics severely disrupt family life. However, not all families are impacted equally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, surveys highlighted how most of UK society coped, but tended to exclude high-risk families. We sought to redress this. MethodsForty-three participants (25 parents from high-risk families; 18 family-support professionals) were interviewed about family their experiences during the first three months of lockdown. Interviews were conducted in two phases: around the start of the pandemic in April 2020, and during the first easing of restrictions in July 2020. Interviews were analysed using Thematic Analysis. ResultsSix major themes were identified: health & wellbeing, family dynamics, work & employment, education, home environment and adherence to government restrictions. Families faced challenges in creating a balance between parents work and childcare. A wide range of risk and protective factors, and the influence of pre-existing experiences, contributed to whether a family entered a Virtuous (supportive) or a Vicious (maladaptive) cycle of family coping. Negative pre-existing experiences worsened some families adaptation but helped other families to have resilience. ConclusionThis study extends the Family Stress Model by illustrating the potential for resilience among high-risk families, highlighting potential mechanisms that might enable some families to transform adversity into strength. These findings may be useful for professionals supporting high-risk families coping with societal stressors and for the development of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a context-relevant psychosocial stimulation intervention to promote cognitive development of children with severe acute malnutrition in Mwanza, Tanzania 96%
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 95%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 94%
- Early Life Predictors of Child Development at Kindergarten: A Structural Equation Model using a Longitudinal Cohort 91%
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 95%
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 95%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 92%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 92%
- Mental health challenges and the associated factors in HIV-positive women who have children living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 94%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 93%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.