Back

How do families cope with major societal stressors: a qualitative study of family coping during the pandemic?

Bali, E.; Petr-Romao, P.; Dyas, R.; English, O.; MacLean, J.; O'Neil, I.; Minnis, H.

2025-05-09 public and global health
10.1101/2025.05.08.25327227 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMajor societal stressors such as wars, natural disasters and pandemics severely disrupt family life. However, not all families are impacted equally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, surveys highlighted how most of UK society coped, but tended to exclude high-risk families. We sought to redress this. MethodsForty-three participants (25 parents from high-risk families; 18 family-support professionals) were interviewed about family their experiences during the first three months of lockdown. Interviews were conducted in two phases: around the start of the pandemic in April 2020, and during the first easing of restrictions in July 2020. Interviews were analysed using Thematic Analysis. ResultsSix major themes were identified: health & wellbeing, family dynamics, work & employment, education, home environment and adherence to government restrictions. Families faced challenges in creating a balance between parents work and childcare. A wide range of risk and protective factors, and the influence of pre-existing experiences, contributed to whether a family entered a Virtuous (supportive) or a Vicious (maladaptive) cycle of family coping. Negative pre-existing experiences worsened some families adaptation but helped other families to have resilience. ConclusionThis study extends the Family Stress Model by illustrating the potential for resilience among high-risk families, highlighting potential mechanisms that might enable some families to transform adversity into strength. These findings may be useful for professionals supporting high-risk families coping with societal stressors and for the development of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
3
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
20
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%