Automated detection of bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia on MRI-PET in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy
Macdonald-Laurs, E.; Warren, A. E. L.; Mito, R.; Genc, S.; Alexander, B.; Barton, S.; Yang, J. Y.; Francis, P.; Pardoe, H. R.; Jackson, G.; Harvey, A. S.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesBottom-of-sulcus dysplasia (BOSD) is a diagnostically challenging subtype of focal cortical dysplasia, 60% being missed on patients first MRI. Automated MRI-based detection methods have been developed for focal cortical dysplasia, but not BOSD specifically. Use of FDG-PET alongside MRI is not established in automated methods. We report the development and performance of an automated BOSD detector using combined MRI+PET data. MethodsThe training set comprised 54 mostly operated patients with BOSD. The test sets comprised 17 subsequently diagnosed patients with BOSD from the same center, and 12 published patients from a different center. 81% patients across training and test sets had reportedly normal first MRIs and most BOSDs were <1.5cm3. In the training set, 12 features from T1-MRI, FLAIR-MRI and FDG-PET were evaluated using a novel "pseudo-control" normalization approach to determine which features best distinguished dysplastic from normal-appearing cortex. Using the Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection groups machine-learning detection method with the addition of FDG-PET, neural network classifiers were then trained and tested on MRI+PET features, MRI-only and PET-only. The proportion of patients whose BOSD was overlapped by the top output cluster, and the top five output clusters, were assessed. ResultsCortical and subcortical hypometabolism on FDG-PET were superior in discriminating dysplastic from normal-appearing cortex compared to MRI features. When the BOSD detector was trained on MRI+PET features, 87% BOSDs were overlapped by one of the top five clusters (69% top cluster) in the training set, 76% in the prospective test set (71% top cluster) and 75% in the published test set (42% top cluster). Cluster overlap was similar when the detector was trained and tested on PET-only features but lower when trained and tested on MRI-only features. ConclusionDetection of BOSD is possible using established MRI-based automated detection methods, supplemented with FDG-PET features and trained on a BOSD-specific cohort. In clinical practice, an MRI+PET BOSD detector could improve assessment and outcomes in seemingly MRI-negative patients being considered for epilepsy surgery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of common PI3K-AKT-MTOR mutations in pediatric surgical epilepsy by droplet digital PCR reveals novel clinical and molecular insights 94%
- Source-sink connectivity: A novel interictal EEG marker for seizure localization 93%
- Multisite Thalamic Recordings to Characterize Seizure Propagation in the Human Brain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project: Predictors of lesion location and postsurgical seizure freedom in focal cortical dysplasia 96%
- Ablation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Hyperintensity Clusters and Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Improves Seizure Outcomes after Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy 95%
- Synchronizability predicts effective responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy prior to treatment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.