Back

The illusion of stability in long-lived species: Poor early-life survival threatens the persistence of Giant Aldabra tortoise populations.

Lavigne, A. M.; Bullock, R.; Hemmings, N.

2025-05-11 zoology
10.1101/2025.05.07.652633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In long-lived species, logistical constraints often limit monitoring to adult population censuses, potentially generating data that is biased towards older, more discernible individuals, and obscuring problems occurring at early life stages. Since adult populations of long-lived species can persist for decades despite reduced productivity, declines driven by reproductive failure may remain undetected until sudden population collapses occur. We present preliminary data on fertilisation success, early embryo survival, and hatching success, across one natural and five translocated populations of Aldabra giant tortoises (Aldabrachelys gigantea) in the Seychelles. Of 317 eggs from 24 clutches, only 16% successfully hatched. Most failed eggs (97%) were undeveloped, and using recently developed microscopic methods to assess egg fertility, we provide the first population-level comparisons of fertilisation and hatching outcomes for this species. Although sample sizes are limited, our results consistently indicate low and variable hatching success across populations, driven primarily by embryo mortality. Complete clutch failure was common (67%), and among clutches that did experience some degree of hatching success, early embryo mortality was still prevalent. Hatching rates were markedly reduced in translocated populations (0-26%) compared to the natural Aldabra Atoll population (46%) and consistently fell below historical hatching rate estimates (60-80%) reported [~]50 years ago. Although preliminary, these data provide the most accurate estimates of fertility available for Aldabra giant tortoises, as well as the first reproductive success data for any translocated population and the first for Aldabra in the last five decades. Our findings highlight the limitations of relying solely on adult census data for threat assessments in long-lived species. We argue that it is essential to incorporate productivity metrics into monitoring frameworks to improve population vulnerability predictions and inform effective conservation management.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
18
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
21
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
22
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
23
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
24
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%