The lac repressor strikes a balance between inducibility and strength of repression
Yuan, J.; Luking, M.; Zikrin, S.; Sen, B.; Marklund, E.; Fange, D.; Elf, J.
Show abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) efficiently locate their target DNA sequences by combining three-dimensional diffusion and one-dimensional sliding on nonspecific DNA. To balance rapid sliding with strong specific binding, TFs were proposed to switch between search and recognition conformations. For E. coli lac repressor (LacI), the folding of the hinge helices has been implicated in the conformational switch. Here, we tested how mutations in the hinge region impact the search speed and binding stability. Based on molecular dynamics simulations, we selected two LacI mutants favoring either search or recognition conformation. We measured the binding kinetics of the mutants both in vitro on DNA microarrays with 2,479 different Lac operators and in vivo via single-molecule experiments. We conclude that a hinge region mutation causing less helix propensity enhances the specificity but reduces binding strength globally, while a hinge region mutation causing higher helix propensity has opposite effects. However, altered specificity impacts the search time less than expected. Instead, the major effect was impaired dissociation in response to IPTG induction for the strongly binding mutant. Together with earlier reports of affinity-inducibility trade-offs in LacI, our data support the model in which the hinge region governs a trade-off between binding stability and inducibility rather than between speed and binding stability.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromosomal domain formation by archaeal SMC, a roadblock protein, and DNA structure 96%
- Systematic analysis of low-affinity transcription factor binding site clusters in vitro and in vivo establishes their functional relevance 96%
- A complex between IF2 and NusA links transcription and translation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.