Back

Multimodal Integration of Plasma, MRI, and Genetic Risk for Cerebral Amyloid Prediction

yichen, w.; Chen, H.; yuxin, C.; Yuyan, C.; shiyun, Z.; Kexin, W.; Yidong, J.; Tianyu, B.; Yanxi, H.; MingKai, Z.; Chengxiang, Y.; Guozheng, F.; Weijie, H.; Ni, S.; Ying, H.

2025-05-08 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.05.07.25326855 medRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD), the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, is marked by the accumulation of amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) plaques. Although cerebral A{beta} positron emission tomography (A{beta}-PET) remains the gold standard for assessing cerebral A{beta} burden, its clinical utility is hindered by cost, radiation exposure, and limited availability. Plasma biomarkers serve as promising non-invasive predictors of cerebral A{beta} burden, but reliance on a single marker often leads to suboptimal predictive performance. To address this, we proposed a multimodal machine learning strategy that integrates readily accessible and non-invasive features--such as plasma biomarkers, structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)-derived atrophy measures, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based structural connectomes (SCs), and genetic risk profiles--to predict cerebral A{beta} burden and evaluate the relative contribution of each modality to predictive performance. Specifically, a random forest regressor was trained using data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; n = 150) and evaluated with leave-one-out cross-validation. Our results showed that integrating multimodal features improves the predictive power on cerebral amyloid burden: while the baseline model using plasma and clinical variables alone achieved an R{superscript 2} of 0.52, adding neuroimaging and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype features improved performance (R{superscript 2} = 0.617), and replacing APOE with polygenic risk scores (PRS) further enhanced accuracy (R{superscript 2} = 0.637). The predictive value of multimodal integration was also replicated in an independent cohort (SILCODE; n = 101). Moreover, a multiclass classifier trained with the same multimodal features achieved high accuracy in distinguishing clinical stages of A{beta} burden--normal controls (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimers disease (AD)--with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.86, 0.77, and 0.93, respectively. These findings highlight the value of combining plasma, imaging, and genetic data to non-invasively estimate cerebral A{beta} burden, offering a potential alternative to PET imaging for early AD risk assessment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
4
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.7%
5
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
17
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%