Back

Inferring diffusion, reaction, and exchange parameters from imperfect FRAP

Lorenzetti, E.; Municio-Diaz, C.; MINC, N.; Boudaoud, A.; Fruleux, A.

2025-05-06 biophysics
10.1101/2025.05.06.652329 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is broadly used to investigate the dynamics of molecules in cells and tissues, notably to quantify diffusion coefficients. FRAP is based on the spatiotemporal imaging of fluorescent molecules following an initial bleaching of fluorescence in a region of the sample. Although a large number of methods have been developed to infer kinetic parameters from experiments, it is still a challenge to fully characterize molecular dynamics from noisy experiments in which diffusion is coupled to other molecular processes or in which the initial bleaching profile is not perfectly controlled. To address this challenge, we have developed HiFRAP to quantify the reaction-(or exchange-)diffusion kinetic parameters from FRAP under imperfect experimental conditions. HiFRAP is based on a low-rank approximation of a kernel related to the model Greens function and is implemented as an ImageJ/Python macro for (potentially curved) one-dimensional systems and for two-dimensional systems. To the best of our knowledge, HiFRAP offers features that have not been combined together: making no assumption on the initial bleaching profile, which does not need to be known; accounting for the limitation of the optical setup by diffraction; inferring several kinetic parameters from a single experiment; providing errors on parameter estimation; and testing model goodness. In the future, our approach could be applied to other dynamical processes described by linear partial differential equations, which could be useful beyond FRAP, in experiments where the concentration fields are monitored over space and time. SIGNIFICANCEFluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a microscopy approach that is widely used to investigate the diffusion and transport of molecules in life sciences and in material sciences. Numerous methods have been developed to derive kinetic parameters such as diffusion and binding coefficients. However, these methods suffer from limitations associated with experimental constraints, such as technical noise or an imperfectly known initial condition. To circumvent these limitations, we developed a comprehensive approach to estimate several kinetic parameters from a single experiment, to assess the precision of estimation, and to test whether the underlying model is well-suited. We implemented this approach in HiFRAP, an ImageJ/Python macro of broad applicability to one- and two-dimensional systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
2
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
5
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
6
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
9
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
12
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
22
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
27
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%