Back

Tool Choice drastically Impacts CRISPR Spacer-Protospacer Detection

Neri, U.; Camargo, A. P.; Bushnell, B.; Roux, S.

2025-05-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.06.652306 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) systems are a fundamental defense mechanism in prokaryotes, where short sequences called spacers are stored in the host genome to recognize and target exogenous genetic elements. Viromics, the study of viral communities in environmental samples, relies heavily on identifying these spacer-target interactions to understand host-virus relationships. However, the choice of sequence search tool to identify putative spacer targets is often overlooked, leading to an unknown impact of downstream inferences in virus-host analysis. Here, we utilize simulated and real datasets to compare popular sequence alignment and search tools, revealing critical differences in their ability to detect multiple matches and handle varying degrees of sequence identity between spacers and potential targets. Finally, we provide general guidelines that may inform future research regarding matching, which is a common practice in studying the complex nature of host-MGE interactions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
7
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.4%
9
Microbial Genomics
● 225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
10
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
12
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
13
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.3%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
● 51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.