Back

Patterns of grass (Poaceae) species distribution and richness across India

Mande, M.; Joshi, A. A.; Paramjyothi, H.; Ratnam, J.; Sankaran, M.

2025-05-07 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.06.651586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tropical grassy biomes (TGBs) cover a substantial portion of Earths land surface area and support a rich diversity of fauna and flora. Yet, despite their importance for biodiversity and human livelihoods, the TGBs of South Asia, including India, have historically been undervalued, and as result, understudied. Here, we address this gap with the first subcontinental-scale analyses of grass species richness and distribution across the Indian region. Using data on species occurrences collated from multiple regional floras, we describe the distribution of families, functional groups and species of Poaecea across this region, and their variation as a function of climate and geomorphology. India hosts >1100 grass species, comprising [~]10% of global grass richness. Over half of these were perennial C4 grasses, with Panicoideae being the most speciose subfamily in the country. Consistent with patterns observed globally, the PACMAD clade consisting of both C3 and C4 species was more speciose in warmer regions, while the C3 subfamilies of the BEP clade, Pooideae and Bambusoideae, were more abundant in cooler regions of the country. Both total and C4 species richness were greatest in warmer districts with high moisture availability, while cooler and wetter districts with low precipitation seasonality supported greater C3 species richness. Our results spotlight previously unrecognized areas of high grass species richness in the arid and semi-arid areas of North-West India and the Deccan Peninsula in India, and call for conservation attention to neglected regions that are outside known biodiversity hotspots and protected areas.

Published in Global Ecology and Conservation (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.