AWmeta empowers adaptively-weighted transcriptomic meta-analysis
Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Feng, C.; Fang, Q.; Chen, M.
Show abstract
Transcriptomic meta-analysis enhances biological veracity and reproducibility by integrating diverse studies, yet prevailing P-value or effect-size integration approaches exhibit limited power to resolve subtle signatures. We present AWmeta, an adaptively-weighted framework that unifies both paradigms. Benchmarking across 35 Parkinsons and Crohns disease datasets spanning diverse tissues and adaptively down-weighting underpowered studies, AWmeta yields higher-fidelity differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with markedly reduced false positives and establishes superior gene differential quantification convergence at both gene and study levels over state-of-the-art random-effects model (REM) and original studies. AWmeta requires fewer samples and DEGs from original studies to achieve substantial gene differential estimates, lowering experimental costs. We demonstrate AWmetas remarkable stability and robustness against external and internal perturbations. Crucially, AWmeta prioritizes disease tissue-specific mechanisms with higher functional coherence than those from REM and original studies. By bridging statistical rigor with mechanistic interpretability, AWmeta harmonizes heterogeneous transcriptomic data into actionable insights, serving as a transformative tool for precision transcriptomic integration.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SnapHiC-G: identifying long-range enhancer-promoter interactions from single-cell Hi-C data via a global background model 93%
- Benchmarking Differential Abundance Analysis Methods for Correlated Microbiome Sequencing Data 93%
- Computationally scalable regression modeling for ultrahigh-dimensional omics data with ParProx 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- GeneWalk identifies relevant gene functions for a biological context using network representation learning 94%
- Cell-type specific inference from bulk RNA-sequencing data by integrating single cell reference profiles via EPIC-unmix 94%
- A large-sample crisis? Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.