Back

AWmeta empowers adaptively-weighted transcriptomic meta-analysis

Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Feng, C.; Fang, Q.; Chen, M.

2025-05-07 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.06.650408 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcriptomic meta-analysis enhances biological veracity and reproducibility by integrating diverse studies, yet prevailing P-value or effect-size integration approaches exhibit limited power to resolve subtle signatures. We present AWmeta, an adaptively-weighted framework that unifies both paradigms. Benchmarking across 35 Parkinsons and Crohns disease datasets spanning diverse tissues and adaptively down-weighting underpowered studies, AWmeta yields higher-fidelity differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with markedly reduced false positives and establishes superior gene differential quantification convergence at both gene and study levels over state-of-the-art random-effects model (REM) and original studies. AWmeta requires fewer samples and DEGs from original studies to achieve substantial gene differential estimates, lowering experimental costs. We demonstrate AWmetas remarkable stability and robustness against external and internal perturbations. Crucially, AWmeta prioritizes disease tissue-specific mechanisms with higher functional coherence than those from REM and original studies. By bridging statistical rigor with mechanistic interpretability, AWmeta harmonizes heterogeneous transcriptomic data into actionable insights, serving as a transformative tool for precision transcriptomic integration.

Published in Current Issues in Molecular Biology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.