Regional Disparities in the Social Determinants of Stroke Severity
Barnard, J. M.; Lin, D.; Armstrong, G. Z.; Calumpang, N.; Cash, M.; Han, A. W.
Show abstract
IntroductionSocial determinants of health (SDOH) are known factors of stroke risk and outcomes. We aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of stroke risk-specific SDOH on stroke severity by investigating the patient population served by a regional healthcare system. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed patient data from the American Heart Associations Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (AHA GWTG-S) Case Record Forms, collected from three stroke centers between January 2022 and May 2024. We compared the patient ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores to the predictor variables of age, sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, ZIP code, payment sources, and mode of arrival. ResultsWhen age-adjusted, Black or African American patients had higher mean NIHSS scores and higher rates of Minor Stroke Symptoms than White patients (p<0.01, p<0.01). ZIP Codes with higher mean NIHSS stroke scale scores correlated significantly with ZIP Codes defined by lower median household income (r=-0.61, p<0.01), lower education attainment (r=-0.71, p<0.001), and higher percentages of minority group populations (r=0.50, p<0.02). Patients with higher mean scores across all measures were those associated with using Medicare versus private insurance (p<0.0001) and those arriving at the hospital via EMS versus private transport (p<0.01). ConclusionsThis research addresses the significance of surveying region-specific social determinants of health for insight into targeted interventions. Initiatives such as expanding stroke awareness education and increasing preventative screenings in the community may reduce disparities in stroke severity and improve outcomes in underserved areas.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 97%
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 97%
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 97%
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 96%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 96%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 97%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 95%
- Treatment of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A 20-year National Inpatient Sample Review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 95%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 95%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.