Back

The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) longitudinal study protocol: Phase 4 ('Enrichment') and Phase 5 ('Rescan')

Demetriou, I.; Attaheri, A.; Bingham, T.; Duckett, W.; Bridge, L.; Raykov, P.; Tsvetanov, K. A.; Correia, M.; Apsvalka, D.; Crespo-Garcia, M.; Campbell, K.; Morcom, A.; Mitchell, D. J.; Rowe, J.; Wolpe, N.; Henderson, S. E.; Cam-CAN, ; Henson, R.

2025-05-07 neurology
10.1101/2025.05.06.25327023 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) started in 2010 to study the effect of healthy adult ageing on cognition and the brain in a population-derived sample. The study design and protocol for Phases 1-3 of Cam-CAN were detailed in Shafto et al. (2014); this paper outlines the design and protocol of Phases 4-5, which enable longitudinal investigation of cognitive and brain ageing over approximately 12 years. More details about the Cam-CAN project can be found here: www.cam-can.org. Methods/DesignPhase 4 was an at-home assessment of cognition, demographics and lifestyle, performed approximately 6 years after Phase 1 (baseline assessment), for which all people from Phase 1 were invited. Phase 5 combined repeated online cognitive, demographics and lifestyle assessment, followed by in-lab attendance for MRI and MEG brain scanning, approximately 12 years after Phase 1, for which all people from Phase 2 (baseline brain assessment) were invited. Demographics, lifestyle and cognitive data are therefore now available for three timepoints, and MRI and MEG brain data for two timepoints. DiscussionThe Cam-CAN study offers deep and wide phenotyping of neurocognitive health across the adult lifespan (18-96). These rich data will allow researchers to address questions like: why do some people maintain their cognitive abilities better than others, in terms of their brain structure or function, their lifestyle and/or their genetics? Given the shifting demographics towards old age in most countries, this knowledge will be important to help people function independently for longer, reducing both individual and societal burden.

Published in Exploration of Neuroscience · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.