Back

A Super-Loop Extrusion Mechanism Shapes the 3D Mitotic Chromosome Folding

Norouzi, D.

2025-05-09 genomics
10.1101/2025.05.05.652288 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite significant advances in understanding mitotic chromosome folding, existing loop-extrusion models - based on two nested tiers of Condensin I- and II-mediated loops - fail to fully reproduce the structural features of chromosomes observed in vivo. We propose a hierarchical three-layer model in which a third set of megabase-scale "super-loops," extruded by a small number of high-processivity motors, compacts chromatin to its native dimensions. Polymer simulations of human chromosome 1 (250 Mb) show that 25-200 consecutive or interlaced super-extruders forming [~]10 Mb loops are sufficient to collapse a 25 m bottle-brush structure into the empirically observed 5-8 x 1.5 m rod. This model simultaneously reproduces the second diagonal in mitotic Hi-C maps, the double-helical scaffold seen in 3D-SIM microscopy, and the alternating-handedness, zero-mean helicity reported by high-resolution imaging. Interlaced super-loops enhance structural robustness against extruder loss and naturally account for the centromere as a region devoid of super-extruders. Although our simulations remain agnostic to molecular identity, we hypothesize that specialized forms of Condensin II, aided by auxiliary chromosome-associated proteins, act as super-extruders, while Topoisomerase II and other cross-linkers stabilize accumulated stress by converting transient DNA crossings into durable catenations. This three-layered mechanism resolves longstanding discrepancies in chromosome size, shape, contact-map profile, and scaffold ultrastructure within a unified physics-based framework. The next step is to identify or distinguish super-extruders experimentally and to design Hi-C, imaging, or mechanical perturbation assays to validate their existence and dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.