Back

A Platform for Mitochondrial Profiling in Enriched Kidney Segments Under Thermodynamic Control

Decker, S. T.; Opurum, P. C.; Choi, R. H.; Paula, V. L.; Kurian, A. S.; Stewart, D.; Nikolova, L. S.; Sanchez, A.; Al-Rabadi, L.; Ramkumar, N.; Fisher-Wellman, K. H.; Funai, K.

2025-05-09 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.05.05.652276 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mitochondrial function varies widely across kidney nephron segments, yet conventional approaches lack the resolution and control needed to assess cell-type-specific bioenergetics in situ. We present a methodological platform that enables segment-resolved profiling of mitochondrial respiration, conductance, and membrane potential in freshly isolated mouse and human nephron segments. Combining mechanical sieving and adhesion-based enrichment with permeabilized high-resolution respirometry, we adapted the creatine kinase clamp to quantify oxygen flux and mitochondrial membrane potential across defined free energies. Using this approach, we found that proximal tubules exhibit high respiratory conductance and dynamic mitochondrial polarization, while distal tubules and glomeruli maintain static membrane potential and low conductance. In a model of adenine-induced nephropathy, only proximal tubule mitochondria showed marked reductions in respiration and ATP production. This segment-specific dysfunction was not detectable in bulk mitochondrial isolates. We then demonstrate that these methods can be applied in human kidney samples. Our approach provides thermodynamically anchored, segment-resolved insight into mitochondrial adaptation under physiological and pathological conditions. It is broadly applicable to other tissues with metabolic heterogeneity and compatible with disease models, genetic tools, and pharmacological interventions. This platform bridges a critical gap between conventional respirometry and functional mitochondrial phenotyping in native tissue structures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.