Single pulse electrical stimulation in white matter modulates iEEG visual responses in human early visual cortex
Huang, H.; Kay, K. N.; Gregg, N. M.; Valencia, G. O.; In, M.-H.; Kapeller, C.; Shu, Y.; Worrell, G. A.; Miller, K. J.; Hermes, D.
Show abstract
Electrical stimulation is increasingly used to modulate brain networks for clinical purposes. The basic unit of neurostimulation, a single electrical pulse, can travel through white matter to influence connected neuronal populations. However, the mechanisms by which it influences connected populations is not well understood: stimulation may excite, inhibit, or add noise to neuronal population activity. In this study, we investigated how single pulses modulate the neuronal processing of images in a well-controlled visual paradigm. In two human subjects implanted with iEEG electrodes for clinical purposes, single pulses were delivered to electrodes in white matter tracts connected to measurement electrodes in visual cortex. Images appeared on-screen at 0, 100, or 200 ms after each pulse. Using finite impulse response modeling, we decomposed the broadband and evoked potential responses into separate components induced by electrical stimulation and by visual processing. Single pulses induced transient broadband increases followed by suppression, but they did not modulate the visual broadband responses (i.e., stimulation response was additive to visual response). In contrast, single pulses elicited prominent brain stimulation evoked potentials and they modulated the visual evoked potentials. Specifically, visual evoked potentials were larger when stimulation occurred closer to visual onset. This indicates that a single electrical pulse can increase the strength or synchrony of visual inputs. Overall, these findings suggest that the effects of electrical stimulation in the visual system are two-fold: stimulation induces additive effects on broadband power, possibly by adding noise, and it interacts with synchronous visual inputs to amplify them.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity. 96%
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Humans 97%
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects 96%
- Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A biomimetic electrical stimulation strategy to induce asynchronous stochastic neural activity 95%
- Neural subspaces of imagined movements in parietal cortex remain stable over several years in humans. 94%
- Irregular optogenetic stimulation waveforms can induce naturalistic patterns of hippocampal spectral activity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Practical Preprocessing Pipeline for Concurrent TMS-iEEG: Critical Steps and Methodological Considerations 95%
- Effective connectivity and spatial selectivity-dependent fMRI changes elicited by microstimulation of pulvinar and LIP 95%
- tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.