Back

The nanosd integral gene drive enables population modification of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae

Yen, P.-S.; Verkuijl, S. A.; Capriotti, P.; Del Corsano, G.; Hoermann, A.; Inghilterra, M. G.; Aramburu-Gonzalez, I.; Kahn, M. A.; Christophides, G. K.; Vlachou, D.; Windbichler, N.

2025-05-02 synthetic biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.05.02.651860 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The modification of mosquito populations at scale through CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homing gene drives is a promising route for malaria vector control. Integral gene drives (IGDs) are designed to utilize the regulatory sequences of endogenous genes to express only the minimal set of components required for gene drive. In this study, we describe the creation and characterization of the nanosd IGD targeting and inserted into the nanos gene of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae and show that it achieves high rates of gene drive (97.7% in females, 99.0% in males). We find that homozygous nanosd females but not males show impaired fecundity, and a variable loss of ovary phenotype. Transcriptomic analysis of ovaries points to decreased transcript levels of the nanos gene when harbouring Cas9. As a minimal genetic modification, nanosd does not induce widespread transcriptomic perturbations, and its susceptibility to Plasmodium spp. and Onyong nyong virus infection remains similar to wild-type mosquitoes. Importantly, we find that nanosd propagates efficiently in caged mosquito populations and is maintained as a source of Cas9 after the emergence of drive resistant alleles whilst also mobilising a non-autonomous antiparasitic effector modification. The nanosd gene drive shows promise as a genetic tool for malaria vector control via population modification, and we outline steps towards its further optimization.

Published in G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.