Back

Can whole-lake algal biomass be captured by one-dimensional modeling approaches? An exploration using 'Lake2D'

Harlin, H.; Larsson, K.; Diehl, S.

2025-05-07 ecology
10.1101/2025.05.02.651842 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Basin morphometry can strongly affect lake-internal processes relevant for productivity, such as turbulent mixing, photosynthetic energy acquisition, sedimentation, and nutrient recycling. Yet, in both empirical and theoretical studies of whole-lake primary production, lake morphometry is often simplified to a single 1-dimensional measure - lake mean depth. Using the conceptual, process-based model Lake2D, we addressed the question: To what extent can pelagic and benthic producer dynamics, integrated over a lake basin, be captured by approaches that use mean depth as the only morphometrical variable? We created two models of algal biomass dynamics in a radially symmetric, cone-shaped lake - one preserving the lakes vertical and radial dimensions and one preserving only the lakes mean depth - and compared model predictions of algal biomass dynamics across a wide range of lake sizes, mixing conditions, water transparency, and nutrient content. Our analyses reveal that model predictions differ substantially but predictably in much of the investigated parameter space, and identifies the light environment set by lake depth, water clarity and pelagic nutrients, but also lake area, as main drivers of the differences. Most commonly, the model based on mean depth underestimates benthic algal biomass and overestimates pelagic algal biomass, the net effect on total biomass being a 5-50% underestimate in shallow lakes and a 5-20% overestimate in many deeper lakes. Since gross primary production (GPP) in our model scales with algal biomass, we believe that global estimates of lake GPP should be corrected for the systematic errors inflicted by the prevailing 1-dimensional approaches.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.9%
3
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
14
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
16
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
21
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
25
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%