Differential cell signaling testing for cell-cell communication inference from single-cell data by dominoSignal
Mitchell, J. T.; Stapleton, O.; Krishnan, K.; Nagaraj, S.; Lvovs, D.; Cherry, C.; Poissonnier, A.; Horton, W.; Adey, A.; Rao, V.; Huff, A.; Zimmerman, J. W.; Kagohara, L. T.; Zaidi, N.; Coussens, L. M.; Jaffee, E. M.; Elisseeff, J. H.; Fertig, E. J.
Show abstract
Algorithms for ligand-receptor network inference have emerged as commonly used tools to estimate cell-cell communication from reference single-cell data. Many studies employ these algorithms to compare signaling between conditions and lack methods to statistically identify signals that are significantly different. We previously developed the cell communication inference algorithm Domino, which considers ligand and receptor gene expression in association with downstream transcription factor activity scoring. We developed the dominoSignal software to innovate upon Domino and extend its functionality to test statistically differential cellular signaling. This new functionality includes compilation of active signals as linkages from multiple subjects in a single-cell data set and testing condition-dependent signaling linkage. The software is applicable for analysis of single-cell data sets with multiple subjects as biological replicates as well as with bootstrapped replicates from data sets with few or pooled subjects. We use simulation studies to benchmark the number of subjects in compared groups and cells within an annotated cell type sufficient to accurately identify differential linkages. We demonstrate the application of the Differential Cell Signaling Test (DCST) in the dominoSignal software to investigate consequences of cancer cell phenotypes and immunotherapy on cell-cell communication in tumor microenvironments. These applications in cancer studies demonstrate the ability of differential cell signaling analysis to infer changes to cell communication networks from therapeutic or experimental perturbations, which is broadly applicable across biological systems.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting tumor cell programs through group biology estimation in clinical single-cell transcriptomics 97%
- stLearn: integrating spatial location, tissue morphology and gene expression to find cell types, cell-cell interactions and spatial trajectories within undissociated tissues 96%
- Identification of Relevant Genetic Alterations in Cancer using Topological Data Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer Hallmarks Define a Continuum of Plastic Cell States between Small Cell Lung Cancer Archetypes 96%
- Automated assignment of cell identity from single-cell multiplexed imaging and proteomic data 95%
- Differential Allele-Specific Expression Uncovers Breast Cancer Genes Dysregulated By Cis Noncoding Mutations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.