Cost-Effectiveness of Integrative Concepts for the Treatment of Oncologcial Patients (OCEANic): Protocol for a Systematic Review
Schad, F.; Thronicke, A.; Reinhold, T.; Oei, S. L.; Boujnah, H.; Baldini, E.; Szoke, H.; Fuller-Shavel, N.; Seifert, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntegrative oncology combines conventional cancer treatments with complementary medicine to enhance patient-centered care, symptom management, and overall well-being. Despite growing demand in Europe, challenges such as unequal access, reimbursement policies, and limited cost-effectiveness research hinder its broader integration into healthcare systems. This systematic review will evaluate the financial sustainability of integrative oncology interventions, providing evidence to support policy decisions and future investments in patient-centered cancer care. MethodsA systematic review will be conducted following PRISMA guidelines, applying PICO criteria for study inclusion, focusing on adult cancer patients receiving integrative therapies and evaluating their economic impact. The review is currently in the literature search phase, using predefined search terms across selected databases. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals, including randomized and non-randomized trials, will be considered, while studies on adolescents or without economic evaluations will be excluded. Records will be managed using EndNote, and two independent reviewers will assess study eligibility through title and abstract screening, resolving discrepancies through discussion, with a third reviewer if needed. Data will be extracted independently using a standardized form, including study characteristics, sample size, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness details. Comparative analyses will focus on clinical and humanistic outcomes, using key metrics like ICER and CBR. A narrative synthesis will evaluate study quality and methodology, with no meta-analysis due to expected heterogeneity. As this study does not involve human participants or personal data, ethics approval is not required. ResultsThe systematic review is currently in progress. Pilot work and initial study identification have begun, though not yet completed. Screening of search results is scheduled to commence in mid-May 2025, followed by data extraction in early June. Completion of the review is anticipated by the end of October 2025. DiscussionThe findings will provide valuable insights into the cost-effectiveness of integrative oncology interventions, informing healthcare policy, clinical practice, and future research directions. By identifying financially sustainable integrative treatments, this project aims to enhance patient care and optimize resource allocation within oncology healthcare systems. Trial registrationPROSPERO, registration number 1019386, date of registration 25 March, 2025.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 95%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 95%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 93%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 92%
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 93%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 92%
- Strength of Statistical Evidence for the Efficacy of Cancer Drugs: A Bayesian Re-Analysis of Trials Supporting FDA Approval 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.