Back

Hybrid Population PK-Machine Learning Modeling to Predict Infliximab Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Crohn's Disease

Irie, K.; Phillip, M.; Reifenberg, J.; Brendan, B. M.; Noe, J. D.; Jeffrey, H.; Mizuno, T.

2025-05-07 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.05.01.651780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) model-based Bayesian estimation is widely used for dose individualization, particularly when sample availability is limited. However, its predictive accuracy can be compromised by factors such as misspecified prior information, intra-patient variability, and uncertainties in PK variations. In this study, we developed a hybrid approach that combines machine learning (ML) with population PK-based Bayesian methods to improve the prediction of infliximab concentrations in children with Crohns disease. We calculated prediction errors between Bayesian-estimated and observed infliximab concentrations from 292 measurements across 93 patients. Incorporating clinical patient features, we explored various ML algorithms, including linear regression, random forest, support vector regression, neural networks, and XGBoost to correct the Bayesian-based prediction errors. The predictive performance of these ML models was assessed using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean prediction error (MPE) with 5-fold cross-validation. For Bayesian estimation alone, the RMSE and MPE were 4.8 {micro}g/mL and -0.67 {micro}g/mL, respectively. Among the ML algorithms, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an RMSE of 3.78 {+/-} 0.85 {micro}g/mL and an MPE of -0.03 {+/-} 0.69 {micro}g/mL in 5-fold cross-validation. The ML-corrected Bayesian estimation significantly reduced the absolute prediction error compared to Bayesian estimation alone. This hybrid population PK-ML approach provides a promising framework for improving the predictive performance of Bayesian estimation, with the potential for continuous learning from new clinical data to enhance dose individualization. Key pointsO_LIA new hybrid model combining population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian estimation and machine learning significantly improved the accuracy of infliximab concentration predictions in young adult and pediatric patients with Crohns disease. C_LIO_LIThe developed hybrid model can facilitate infliximab individualized dosing by accounting for changes in clinical conditions and patient-specific factors that the conventional Bayesian estimation approach may not address, and can be integrated into precision dosing dashboards, such as RoadMAB, for real-world clinical application. C_LIO_LIThis study indicates that model predictive accuracy can be enhanced by combining the Bayesian method with machine learning, even with a relatively small amount of clinical data. This is particularly encouraging for specific populations, such as pediatric patients, where obtaining rich clinical data is challenging. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
4
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
8
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
12
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%