Back

Commercially Purchased and In-House Bred C57BL/6 Mice with Different Gut Microbiota Exhibit Distinct Indomethacin-Induced Toxicities

Zhang, J.; Thomas, V.; Sekela, J.; Zeller, M.; Sellers, R.; Redinbo, M.; Gulati, A.; Bhatt, A. P.

2025-05-01 microbiology
10.1101/2025.05.01.651704 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced toxicities are a significant clinical problem, yet the factors influencing these outcomes remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the impact of mouse vendor on indomethacin-induced injury using C57BL/6 mice from different breeding facilities (in-house "Tar Heel" and commercial Charles River). We found that Tar Heel mice exhibited significantly enhanced susceptibility to indomethacin toxicity, characterized by greater body weight loss, increased ileal ulceration, elevated fecal lipocalin-2 levels, and higher goblet cell numbers in ileum compared to Charles River mice. Importantly, whole genome metagenomic analysis revealed distinct baseline gut microbiomes between the two types of mice. Notably, Tar Heel mice showed higher abundances of {beta}-glucuronidase (GUS)-producing bacteria, particularly those expressing Loop-1 GUS enzymes, and elevated levels of mucolytic enzyme-encoding bacteria. These differences suggest that enhanced indomethacin toxicity observed in Tar Heel mice may be related to functional changes in their gut microbiome, which may predispose to an exaggerated response to NSAID exposure. Together, our findings demonstrate that vendor-specific differences significantly influence NSAID-induced intestinal toxicity and highlight the importance of considering mouse sources and gut microbial compositions in experimental design. Moreover, we highlight potential functional roles that gut microbes play in host-indomethacin interactions.

Published in Gut Microbes Reports · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.