Back

Detecting neuroplastic effects induced by ketamine in healthy human subjects: a multimodal approach

Agnorelli, C.; Peill, J.; Sawicka, G.; Kurtin, D. L.; Shatalina, E.; Ahmad, K.; Wall, M. B.; Rua, C.; Godfrey, K.; Ertl, N.; Searle, G.; Zhou, K.; Weiss, B.; Fagiolini, A.; Carhart-Harris, R.; Matthews, P. M.; Rabiner, E.; Nutt, D.; Erritzoe, D.

2025-05-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.05.01.651686 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We investigated ketamines neuroplastic effects in healthy human subjects using integrated Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measures before and 1-8 days after a single psychedelic dose of ketamine (1 mg/kg, intravenous). Eleven participants underwent two PET/MRI scans with [11C]-UCBJ (synaptic density/plasticity), 1H-MRS (Glutamate and GABA), and resting-state fMRI (intrinsic brain activity, functional connectivity, graph-theoretic metrics), before and after ketamine. While group-level analyses showed only trend-level increases in PET synaptic markers, we observed significantly elevated Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) glutamate levels post-ketamine. Functional connectivity analyses revealed decreased within-network integrity, particularly in high-order networks like the default mode network (DMN), alongside increased low-to-high-order network integration. Our multimodal analysis showed that increased [11C]-UCBJ volume distribution (VT), a putative index of synaptic plasticity, correlated with reduced intrinsic activity in DMN regions and decreased influence of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) in global network dynamics. By linking molecular and network-level changes, our results point to the PCC as a central hub where ketamine may reshape brain hierarchies in the long term, providing new directions for understanding its therapeutic mechanisms and developing targeted treatments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.