Sperrfy the brain: A data-driven realization of Sperry's Chemoaffinity theory in the neural connectome
Koike, J.; Yada, Y.; Hira, R.; Naoki, H.
Show abstract
Understanding how brain-wide neural circuits are genetically wired remains a fundamental question in neuroscience. While Sperrys chemoaffinity theory posits that molecular gradients provide positional cues for axonal projections, its application has been largely limited to localized sensory systems. Here, we present SPERRFY (Spatial Positional Encoding for Reconstructing Rules of axonal Fiber connectivitY), a data-driven framework that operationalizes Sperrys theory at the whole-brain scale. By integrating connectomic data with spatial transcriptomic profiles from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas, SPERRFY deciphers latent positional gradients that underlie axonal wiring. Using canonical correlation analysis (CCA), we extract top gradient pairs that align with observed neural connectivity patterns, capturing both global (inter-regional) and local (intra-regional) organizational principles. Connectivity reconstruction based on these gradients achieves high predictive performance (AUC = 0.90), and permutation-based null models confirm the biological relevance of the inferred structures. Furthermore, SPERRFY identifies candidate genes that may contribute to positional wiring information, providing molecular insight into the developmental logic of brain-wide circuitry. Our results extend Sperrys foundational theory beyond the sensory domain, offering a unified, data-driven framework for understanding genetically encoded connectivity across the entire brain.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the mouse brain 96%
- Manifold learning analysis suggests novel strategies for aligning single-cell multi-modalities and revealing functional genomics for neuronal electrophysiology 95%
- Loss of consciousness reduces the stability of brain hubs and the heterogeneity of brain dynamics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.