Back

Cheats can boost the success of a cooperative invader

Lear, L.; Buckling, A.; Hesse, E.

2025-05-05 ecology
10.1101/2025.04.30.651436 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successful biological invasions are dependent on the invader being able to grow and reproduce in the new environment. One way that microbial invaders may facilitate this is to use cooperative public goods, such as metal-binding siderophores. However, siderophore production can be exploited by non-producing cheats who benefit from production without paying any associated costs. Here, we test the importance of cooperation for the success of Pseudomonas aeruginosa invading a 5-species microbial community. We do this by comparing the success of a siderophore-producing strain, a siderophore-deficient mutant strain and a 50:50 mixed population, both in environments with weak (copper absent) and strong (copper present) siderophore requirement. We found no effect of invader type on success when siderophores were less essential for growth, but large differences when they were selectively favoured. Here the producer-cheat mix had the greatest success, with both strains having near equal fitness and reaching high densities, whilst in isolation producers had intermediate success and cheats the lowest. Similarly, resident diversity only differed across invader treatments when copper was present. In conclusion, we show that the presence of cheats can provide a larger benefit for invasion success than pure cooperator populations, but only when public goods are particularly beneficial.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
2
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
28
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%