Back

Spontaneous Dynamics Predict the Effects of Targeted Intervention in Hippocampal Neuronal Cultures

Tentori, E.; Kastellakis, G.; Maschietto, M.; Leparulo, A.; Poirazi, P.; Mazzucato, L.; Allegra, M.; Vassanelli, S.

2025-05-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.29.651327 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microstimulation is a powerful tool for causal interrogation of neural circuits and for therapeutic neuromodulation. However, predicting network-level responses to focal perturbations remains a major challenge. To address this problem in a tractable manner, we combine experiments on networks of hippocampal neurons cultured on high-density multielectrode arrays with spiking network model simulations. To characterize spontaneous and stimulation-evoked network dynamics, we employ a combination of direct electrophysiological readouts and information-theoretic measures. We find that single-channel stimulation reliably evokes a small set of site-specific, stereotyped network activity patterns. Remarkably, effective connectivity inferred from spontaneous activity captures the spatial organization of perturbation responses, enabling reliable ranking of stimulation-evoked effects across the network. Our spiking network model reproduces these observations and reveals the interplay between short-term synaptic depression and distance-dependent excitatory and inhibitory connectivity in shaping both spontaneous and evoked interactions at different effective scales. Spontaneous activity involves local structural routes, while perturbation-evoked responses engage comparatively longer, polysynaptic pathways. By unifying in silico modeling with experimental measurements, this work links spontaneous network structure to stimulation-evoked dynamics, suggesting that spontaneous effective connectivity may serve as a tractable proxy for stimulation targeting in recurrent circuits, with potential implications for the rational design of neuromodulatory interventions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.