Back

Testing the gearbox hypothesis for insect flight control

Ghosh, A.; Kumar G.S., G.; Sane, S. P.

2025-05-02 zoology
10.1101/2025.04.29.651276 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sustained flight in flies requires wing movements at frequencies ranging between 100-1000 Hz, powered by asynchronous flight muscles whose contraction rate exceeds direct neural stimulation. These muscles attach to the thoracic walls in an indirect flight muscle (IFM) configuration, generating thoracic deformations that drive wing flapping, while smaller steering muscles adjust wing kinematics stroke-by-stroke. The wings articulate with the thorax via the wing hinge, in which the radial stop (RS) and a grooved pleural wing process (PWP) interact to form a mechanical "gearbox" system, proposed to modulate wingbeat amplitude during maneuvering. Supporting this gearbox hypothesis, previous studies observed close RS-PWP interactions during fictive turns in tethered flies. An alternative, though not exclusive, hypothesis suggests that steering muscles govern wingbeat amplitude modulation. However, the gearbox hypothesis had not been rigorously tested in freely flying insects. Here, we first assessed the morphological diversity of the RS-PWP-Pterale C complex across Diptera using scanning electron microscopy and found substantial variation, particularly in PWP morphology. We next tested gearbox function by bilaterally ablating the PWP in freely flying houseflies (Musca domestica), which were released into an L-shaped arena requiring 90{degrees} yaw turns. Kinematic analyses revealed no significant differences between control and PWP-ablated flies across various wing and body parameters during yaw turns. Both groups could differentially modulate wingbeat amplitude during turns, a key mechanism for yaw torque generation. These findings indicate that the PWP is not essential for wingbeat amplitude modulation, and suggest that steering muscles may primarily control amplitude control during manuevers. Our results challenge the gearbox hypothesis and underscore the flexibility of the dipteran flight control system.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.