Radiomics-Based Early Triage of Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study from the CHAIMELEON Project
Vraka, A.; Marfil-Trujillo, M.; Cerda-Alberich, L.; Jimenez-Pastor, A.; Marti-Bonmati, L.
Show abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men worldwide. Accurate triage of patients based on tumor aggressiveness and staging is critical for selecting appropriate management pathways. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a mainstay in PCa diagnosis, most predictive models rely on multiparametric imaging or invasive inputs, limiting generalizability in real-world clinical settings. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models using radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted MRI--alone and in combination with clinical variables--to predict ISUP grade (tumor aggressiveness), lymph node involvement (cN) and distant metastasis (cM). A retrospective multicenter cohort from three European sites in the Chaimeleon project was analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted from prostate zone segmentations and lesion masks, following standardized preprocessing and ComBat harmonization. Feature selection and model optimization were performed using nested cross-validation and Bayesian tuning. Hybrid models were trained using XGBoost and interpreted with SHAP values. The ISUP model achieved an AUC of 0.66, while the cN and cM models reached AUCs of 0.77 and 0.80, respectively. The best-performing models consistently combined prostate zone radiomics with clinical features such as PSA, PIRADSv2 and ISUP grade. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of both clinical and texture-based radiomic features, with entropy and non-uniformity measures playing central roles in all tasks. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using T2-weighted MRI and zonal radiomics for robust prediction of aggressiveness, nodal involvement and distant metastasis in PCa. This fully automated pipeline offers an interpretable, accessible and clinically translatable tool for first-line PCa triage, with potential integration into real-world diagnostic workflows.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 94%
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 93%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: a multinational population study 93%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 91%
- Subtyping of common complex diseases and disorders by integrating heterogeneous data. Identifying clusters among women with lower urinary tract symptoms in the LURN study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 91%
- Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images 91%
- Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 93%
- Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer 92%
- Detection of local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type Glioblastoma using relative Cerebral Blood Volume 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification and Visualisation of Normal and Abnormal Radiographs; a comparison between Eleven Convolutional Neural Network Architectures 91%
- Measuring Repositioning in Home Care for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management 89%
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 infected area segmentation in CT images 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.