Classification of outcomes in antimalarial therapeutic efficacy studies with Aster
Gerlovina, I.; Berube, S.; Briggs, J.; Murie, K.; Murphy, M.; Wesolowski, A.; Greenhouse, B.
Show abstract
Reliable assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy is crucial for effective response to emerging drug resistance, and therapeutic efficacy studies (TES) are the primary means of estimating in vivo efficacy. Accuracy of such estimates rests on correctly classifying recurrent infections developed during follow-up as recrudescences or new infections. Genotyping is used to guide classification, but polyclonal infections and alleles matching by chance make classification challenging, especially in high transmission settings. Match-counting algorithms currently recommended by World Health Organization are unreliable and produce biased results, necessitating development of principled statistical approaches. Modern genotyping methods such as multiplexed amplicon sequencing hold great potential for resolving recurrences and motivate the need for corresponding statistical methods able to utilize the rich data they provide. We propose an Adaptive Statistical framework for Therapeutic Efficacy and Recrudescence (Aster) that delivers accurate and consistent results by explicitly incorporating complexity of infection (COI), population allele frequencies, and imperfect detection of alleles in minority strains. Using an identity by descent approach, Aster accounts for alleles matching by chance and for a background infection relatedness structure that can otherwise lead to misclassification. The flexible framework can also use external information, such as parasite density and performance characteristics of a genotyping panel. Using simulations, we show that Aster dramatically outperforms match-counting algorithms in a wide variety of transmission settings and demonstrates consistently balanced performance that improves with more informative genotyping panels. Aster is implemented in a fast, fully scalable, and user-friendly R software package asterTES and provides accurate estimates of treatment failure for TES with any type of genotyping data, facilitating reliable evaluation of drug efficacy and effective management of malaria.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing gene flow between malaria parasite populations 95%
- A cautionary note on the use of unsupervised machine learning algorithms to characterise malaria parasite population structure from genetic distance matrices 94%
- Estimating evolutionary and demographic parameters via ARG-derived IBD 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MOIRE: A software package for the estimation of allele frequenciesand effective multiplicity of infection from polyallelic data 97%
- Optimizing viral genome subsampling by genetic diversity and temporal distribution (TARDiS) for Phylogenetics 94%
- Demixer: A probabilistic generative model to delineate different strains of a microbial species in a mixed infection sample 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.