Back

Persistently increased expression of PKMzeta and unbiased gene expression profiles identify hippocampal molecular traces of a long-term active place avoidance memory and 'shadow' proteins

Han, J.; Grau-Perales, A.; Harris, R. M.; Kao, H.-y.; Pal, A.; Alarcon, J.-M.; Sacktor, T. C.; Martiniani, S.; Hofmann, H. A.; Fenton, A. A.

2025-05-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.28.651143 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term memory formation transiently activates Ca2+-calmodulin kinase II and atypical protein kinase C isoform iota/lambda, whereas persistent activation of the other atypical PKC, protein kinase M zeta (PKM{zeta}), together with its interacting partner, the scaffolding-protein KIBRA (Wwc1), are necessary for maintaining potentiated synapses and memory. Here, we use immediate-early gene (IEG) Arc activation during active place avoidance memory expression to tag memory-activated neurons with EYFP-ChR2. PKM{zeta} immunohistochemistry identified which hippocampal synaptic pathways are persistently altered. EYFP-PKM{zeta} colocalization persistently increases in the hippocampal trisynaptic pathway (dentate gyrus [DG][->]CA3[->]CA1) tracing a one-month-old PKM{zeta} engram. DG, CA3, and CA1 transcriptional profiling identifies that memory persistence correlates with upregulated immediate-early-genes Arc, Fos, and NPas4 in DG, but not with PKM{zeta} or most genes known to be crucial for LTP and memory. This rules out strong memory-related transcriptional regulation, but not regulation of mRNA translation or altered stability of "shadow proteins" like PKM{zeta} that, despite being crucial for memory maintenance, evade detection by unbiased transcriptome profiling. In contrast, our method Correlation Signal Co-cluster Reduction (C-SCoRe) incorporates weak linear and non-linear gene correlations and highlights network interaction changes predicting memory, and related IEG and Prkcz/Wwc1 expression. Manifold transcriptional relationships can reveal shadow molecular components of long-term memory.

Published in Advanced Science · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.