Detecting cryptic ghost lineage introgression in four-taxon genomic datasets
Forsythe, E. S.; Pappa, B. S.; Clavette, D. A.; Mendoza, D. Y.
Show abstract
PremiseHybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence. MethodsHere, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae. ResultOur simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a wide range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted. DiscussionOur analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ghost lineages highly influence the interpretation of introgression tests 97%
- Benefits and Limits of Phasing Alleles for Network Inference of Allopolyploid Complexes 97%
- The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- homologizer: Phylogenetic phasing of gene copies into polyploid subgenomes 97%
- Polymorphism-aware estimation of species trees and evolutionary forces from genomic sequences with RevBayes 96%
- Performance of a phylogenetic independent contrast method and an improved pairwise comparison under different scenarios of trait evolution after speciation and duplication 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.