Back

A functionally validated TCR-pMHC database for TCR specificity model development

Messemaker, M.; Kwee, B. P. Y.; Moravec, Z.; Alvarez-Salmoral, D.; Urbanus, J.; de Paauw, S.; Geerligs, J.; Voogd, R.; Morris, B.; Guislain, A.; Mussmann, M.; Winkler, Y.; Steinmetz, M.; Iras, M.; Marcus, E.; Teuwen, J.; Perrakis, A.; Beijersbergen, R. L.; Scheper, W.; Schumacher, T.

2025-05-01 immunology
10.1101/2025.04.28.651095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate prediction of TCR specificity forms a holy grail in immunology and large language models and computational structure predictions provide a path to achieve this. Importantly, current TCR-pMHC prediction models have been trained and evaluated using historical data of unknown quality. Here, we develop and utilize a high-throughput synthetic platform for TCR assembly and evaluation to assess a large fraction of VDJdb-deposited TCR-pMHC entries using a standardized readout of TCR function. Strikingly, this analysis demonstrates that claimed TCR reactivity is only confirmed for 50% of evaluated entries. Intriguingly, the use of TCRbridge to analyze AlphaFold3 confidence metrics reveals a substantial performance in distinguishing functionally validating and non-validating TCRs even though AlphaFold3 was not trained on this task, demonstrating the utility of the validated VDJdb (TCRvdb) database that we generated. We provide TCRvdb as a resource to the community to support training and evaluation of improved predictive TCR specificity models.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.