Back

An image analysis pipeline to quantify the spatial distribution of cell markers in stroma-rich tumors

Ruzette, A. A.; Kozlova, N.; Cruz, K. A.; Muranen, T.; Norrelykke, S. F.

2025-05-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.28.650414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1.Aggressive cancers, such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), are often characterized by a complex and desmoplastic tumor microenvironment rich in stroma, a supportive connective tissue composed primarily of extracellular matrix (ECM) and non-cancerous cells. Desmoplasia, which is a dense deposition of stroma, is a major reason for therapy resistance, acting both as a physical barrier that interferes with drug penetration and as a supportive niche that protects cancer cells through diverse mechanisms. A precise understanding of spatial cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment in stroma-rich cancers is essential for optimizing therapeutic responses. It allows detailed mapping of stromal-tumor interfaces, comprehensive phenotyping of diverse cell types and their functional states, and insights into changes in cellular distribution and tissue architecture, thus leading to an improved assessment of drug responses. Recent advances in multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging have enabled the acquisition of large batches of whole-slide tumor images, but scalable and reproducible methods to analyze the spatial distribution of cell states relative to stromal regions remain limited. To address this gap, we developed an open-source computational pipeline that integrates QuPath (Bankhead et al. 2017), StarDist (Schmidt et al. 2018), and custom Python scripts to quantify biomarker expression at a single- and sub-cellular resolution across entire tumor sections. Our workflow includes: (i) automated nuclei segmentation using StarDist, (ii) machine learning-based cell classification using multiplexed marker expression, (iii) modeling of stromal regions based on fibronectin staining, (iv) sensitivity analyses on classification thresholds to ensure robustness across heterogeneous datasets, and (v) distance-based quantification of the proximity of each cell to the stromal border. To improve consistency across slides with variable staining intensities, we introduce a statistical strategy that translates classification thresholds by propagating a chosen reference percentile across the distribution of marker-related cell measurement in each image. We apply this approach to quantify spatial patterns of distribution of the phosphorylated form of the N-Myc downregulated gene 1 (NDRG1), a novel DNA repair protein that conveys signals from the ECM to the nucleus to maintain replication fork homeostasis, and a known cell proliferation marker Ki67 in fibronectin-defined stromal regions in PDAC xenografts. The pipeline is applicable for the analysis of various stroma-rich tissues and is publicly available: https://github.com/HMS-IAC/stroma-spatial-analysis-web. 2. Summary paragraphOur study introduces a scalable and reproducible image analysis pipeline that quantifies spatial biomarker distributions relative to the stroma in tumor tissues using open-source tools. By modeling cell-level intensity distributions and calibrating classification thresholds across heterogeneous images, we uncover spatially organized patterns of stroma sensing, DNA damage, and proliferative response in pancreatic tumors. This approach enables robust, quantitative analysis of tumor-stroma interactions and is readily adaptable to other tumor types and biomarker panels, providing a valuable resource for spatial pathology and tumor microenvironment research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
22.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
3
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
9
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
11
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
17
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
19
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
25
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%