Back

Different Effective Infection Control Strategies for Preventing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Related Surgical Site Infections (SSI) in Pakistan

Aslam, M.; Raza, M. N.; Hurera, A.; Iqbal, A.; Ilyas, F.; Irum, T.

2025-04-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.04.28.25326580 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) significantly contributes to surgical site infections (SSIs) in Pakistan, with prevalence rates of 38-50% among S. aureus isolates, increasing morbidity and healthcare costs ObjectiveThis study assessed the effectiveness of infection control strategies in reducing MRSA-related SSIs in Pakistani healthcare facilities, identified implementation barriers, and proposed context-specific recommendations. MethodsA cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted from January to March 2025, surveying 100 healthcare professionals (surgeons, nurses, infection control specialists) across public and private hospitals. A structured questionnaire evaluated infection control practices, with quantitative data analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression, and qualitative responses thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarkes framework. ResultsOnly 10% of facilities routinely screened surgical patients for MRSA, with 62% reporting hand hygiene compliance below 70%. Facilities with regular hand hygiene audits, targeted MRSA screening, and surgical care bundles had significantly lower MRSA-SSI rates (p<0.05). Resource shortages (87%), inadequate training (64%), and organizational barriers (82%) were major challenges. The MRSA positivity rate among high-risk patients was 30.7%. ConclusionStrengthening hand hygiene, selective MRSA screening, and surgical bundles, alongside improved training and resource allocation, can reduce MRSA-SSIs in Pakistan. Tailoring global guidelines to local constraints is essential for effective implementation. These findings guide strategies to enhance surgical safety in resource-limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.